# # Electromagnetic scattering from a sphere (axisymmetric)
#
# Copyright (C) 2022 Michele Castriotta, Igor Baratta, Jørgen S. Dokken
#
# This demo is implemented in three files: one for the mesh generation
# with gmsh, one for the calculation of analytical efficiencies, and one
# for the variational forms and the solver. It illustrates how to:
#
# - Setup and solve Maxwell's equations for axisymmetric geometries
# - Implement (axisymmetric) perfectly matched layers
#
# ## Equations, problem definition and implementation
#
# Import the modules that will be used:

# +
import sys
from functools import partial

import numpy as np
from mesh_sphere_axis import generate_mesh_sphere_axis
from scipy.special import jv, jvp

import ufl
from basix.ufl import element, mixed_element
from dolfinx import default_scalar_type, fem, io, mesh, plot
from dolfinx.fem.petsc import LinearProblem

from mpi4py import MPI

try:
    from dolfinx.io import VTXWriter
    has_vtx = True
except ImportError:
    print("VTXWriter not available, solution won't be saved")
    has_vtx = False

try:
    import gmsh
except ModuleNotFoundError:
    print("This demo requires gmsh to be installed")
    sys.exit(0)

try:
    import pyvista
    have_pyvista = True
except ModuleNotFoundError:
    print("pyvista and pyvistaqt are required to visualise the solution")
    have_pyvista = False
# -

# The time-harmonic Maxwell equation is complex-valued PDE. PETSc must
# therefore have compiled with complex scalars.

if not np.issubdtype(default_scalar_type, np.complexfloating):
    print("Demo should only be executed with DOLFINx complex mode")
    exit(0)

# ## Problem formulation
#
# Consider a metallic sphere embedded in a background medium (e.g., a
# vacuum or water) subject to an incident plane wave, with the objective
# to calculate the scattered electric field. We can simplify the problem
# by considering the axisymmetric case. To verify this, let's consider
# the weak form of the problem with PML:
#
# $$
# \begin{split}
# \int_{\Omega_m\cup\Omega_b}-(\nabla \times \mathbf{E}_s)
# \cdot (\nabla \times \bar{\mathbf{v}})+\varepsilon_{r} k_{0}^{2}
# \mathbf{E}_s \cdot \bar{\mathbf{v}}+k_{0}^{2}\left(\varepsilon_{r}
# -\varepsilon_b\right)\mathbf{E}_b \cdot \bar{\mathbf{v}}~\mathrm{d} x\\
# +\int_{\Omega_{pml}}\left[\boldsymbol{\mu}^{-1}_{pml} \nabla \times \mathbf{E}_s
# \right]\cdot \nabla \times \bar{\mathbf{v}}-k_{0}^{2}
# \left[\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{pml} \mathbf{E}_s \right]\cdot
# \bar{\mathbf{v}}~ d x=0
# \end{split}
# $$
#
# Since we want to exploit axisymmetry of the problem, we can use
# cylindrical coordinates as a more appropriate reference system:
#
# $$
# \begin{split}
# \int_{\Omega_{cs}}\int_{0}^{2\pi}-(\nabla \times \mathbf{E}_s)
# \cdot (\nabla \times \bar{\mathbf{v}})+\varepsilon_{r} k_{0}^{2}
# \mathbf{E}_s \cdot \bar{\mathbf{v}}+k_{0}^{2}\left(\varepsilon_{r}
# -\varepsilon_b\right)\mathbf{E}_b \cdot
# \bar{\mathbf{v}}~ \rho d\rho dz d \phi\\
# +\int_{\Omega_{cs}}
# \int_{0}^{2\pi}\left[\boldsymbol{\mu}^{-1}_{pml} \nabla \times \mathbf{E}_s
# \right]\cdot \nabla \times \bar{\mathbf{v}}-k_{0}^{2}
# \left[\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{pml} \mathbf{E}_s \right]\cdot
# \bar{\mathbf{v}}~ \rho d\rho dz d \phi=0
# \end{split}
# $$
#
# Expanding $\mathbf{E}_s$, $\mathbf{E}_b$ and $\bar{\mathbf{v}}$ in
# cylindrical harmonics:
#
# $$
# \mathbf{E}_s(\rho, z, \phi) &= \sum_m\mathbf{E}^{(m)}_s(\rho, z)e^{-jm\phi} \\
# \mathbf{E}_b(\rho, z, \phi) &= \sum_m\mathbf{E}^{(m)}_b(\rho, z)e^{-jm\phi} \\
# \bar{\mathbf{v}}(\rho, z, \phi) &=
# \sum_m\bar{\mathbf{v}}^{(m)}(\rho, z)e^{+jm\phi}
# $$
#
# The curl operator $\nabla\times$ in cylindrical coordinates becomes:
#
# $$
# \nabla \times \mathbf{a}=
# \sum_{m}\left(\nabla \times \mathbf{a}^{(m)}\right) e^{-j m \phi}
# $$
#
# with:
#
# $$
# \begin{split}
# \left(\nabla \times \mathbf{a}^{(m)}\right) = \left[\hat{\rho}
# \left(-\frac{\partial a_{\phi}^{(m)}}{\partial z}
# -j\frac{m}{\rho} a_{z}^{(m)}\right)+\\ \hat{\phi}
# \left(\frac{\partial a_{\rho}^{(m)}}{\partial z}
# -\frac{\partial a_{z}^{(m)}}{\partial \rho}\right) \right.\\
# \left.+\hat{z}\left(\frac{a_{\phi}^{(m)}}{\rho}
# +\frac{\partial a_{\phi}^{(m)}}{\partial \rho}
# +j \frac{m}{\rho} a_{\rho}^{(m)}\right)\right]
# \end{split}
# $$
#
# Assuming an axisymmetric permittivity $\varepsilon(\rho, z)$,
#
# $$
# \sum_{n, m}\int_{\Omega_{cs}} -(\nabla \times \mathbf{E}^{(m)}_s)
# \cdot (\nabla \times \bar{\mathbf{v}}^{(m)})+\varepsilon_{r} k_{0}^{2}
# \mathbf{E}^{(m)}_s \cdot \bar{\mathbf{v}}^{(m)}+k_{0}^{2}
# \left(\varepsilon_{r}
# -\varepsilon_b\right)\mathbf{E}^{(m)}_b \cdot \bar{\mathbf{v}}^{(m)}\\
# +\left(\boldsymbol{\mu}^{-1}_{pml} \nabla \times \mathbf{E}^{(m)}_s
# \right)\cdot \nabla \times \bar{\mathbf{v}}^{(m)}-k_{0}^{2}
# \left(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{pml} \mathbf{E}^{(m)}_s \right)\cdot
# \bar{\mathbf{v}}^{(m)}~ \rho d\rho dz \int_{0}^{2 \pi} e^{-i(m-n) \phi}
# d \phi=0
# $$
#
# For the last integral, we have that:
#
# $$
# \int_{0}^{2 \pi} e^{-i(m-n) \phi}d \phi=
# \begin{cases}
# 2\pi &\textrm{if } m=n\\
# 0    &\textrm{if }m\neq n
# \end{cases}
# $$
#
# We can therefore consider only the case $m = n$ and simplify the
# summation in the following way:
#
# $$
# \begin{split}
# \sum_{m}\int_{\Omega_{cs}}-(\nabla \times \mathbf{E}^{(m)}_s)
# \cdot (\nabla \times \bar{\mathbf{v}}^{(m)})+\varepsilon_{r} k_{0}^{2}
# \mathbf{E}^{(m)}_s \cdot \bar{\mathbf{v}}^{(m)}
# +k_{0}^{2}\left(\varepsilon_{r}
# -\varepsilon_b\right)\mathbf{E}^{(m)}_b \cdot \bar{\mathbf{v}}^{(m)}\\
# +\left(\boldsymbol{\mu}^{-1}_{pml} \nabla \times \mathbf{E}^{(m)}_s
# \right)\cdot \nabla \times \bar{\mathbf{v}}^{(m)}-k_{0}^{2}
# \left(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{pml} \mathbf{E}^{(m)}_s \right)\cdot
# \bar{\mathbf{v}}^{(m)}~ \rho d\rho dz =0
# \end{split}
# $$
#
# What we have just obtained are multiple weak forms corresponding to
# different cylindrical harmonics propagating independently. Let's now
# solve it in DOLFINx. As a first step we can define the function for
# the $\nabla\times$ operator in cylindrical coordinates:


def curl_axis(a, m: int, rho):
    curl_r = -a[2].dx(1) - 1j * m / rho * a[1]
    curl_z = a[2] / rho + a[2].dx(0) + 1j * m / rho * a[0]
    curl_p = a[0].dx(1) - a[1].dx(0)
    return ufl.as_vector((curl_r, curl_z, curl_p))


# Then we need to define the analytical formula for the background
# field. We will consider a TMz polarized plane wave, that is a plane
# wave with the magnetic field normal to our reference plane
#
# For a TMz polarization, we can write the cylindrical harmonics
# $\mathbf{E}^{(m)}_b$ of the background field in this way ([Wait
# 1955](https://doi.org/10.1139/p55-024)):
#
# $$
# \begin{split}
# \mathbf{E}^{(m)}_b = \hat{\rho} \left(E_{0} \cos \theta
# e^{j k z \cos \theta} j^{-m+1} J_{m}^{\prime}\left(k_{0} \rho \sin
# \theta\right)\right)
# +\hat{z} \left(E_{0} \sin \theta e^{j k z \cos \theta}j^{-m} J_{m}
# \left(k \rho \sin \theta\right)\right)\\
# +\hat{\phi} \left(\frac{E_{0} \cos \theta}{k \rho \sin \theta}
# e^{j k z \cos \theta} mj^{-m} J_{m}\left(k \rho \sin \theta\right)\right)
# \end{split}
# $$
#
# with $k = 2\pi n_b/\lambda = k_0n_b$ being the wavevector, $\theta$
# being the angle between $\mathbf{E}_b$ and $\hat{\rho}$, and $J_m$
# representing the $m$-th order Bessel function of first kind and
# $J_{m}^{\prime}$ its derivative. We implement these functions:

# +
def background_field_rz(theta: float, n_bkg: float, k0: float, m: int, x):
    k = k0 * n_bkg
    a_r = (np.cos(theta) * np.exp(1j * k * x[1] * np.cos(theta))
           * (1j)**(-m + 1) * jvp(m, k * x[0] * np.sin(theta), 1))
    a_z = (np.sin(theta) * np.exp(1j * k * x[1] * np.cos(theta))
           * (1j)**-m * jv(m, k * x[0] * np.sin(theta)))
    return (a_r, a_z)


def background_field_p(theta: float, n_bkg: float, k0: float, m: int, x):
    k = k0 * n_bkg
    a_p = (np.cos(theta) / (k * x[0] * np.sin(theta))
           * np.exp(1j * k * x[1] * np.cos(theta)) * m
           * (1j)**(-m) * jv(m, k * x[0] * np.sin(theta)))
    return a_p
# -

# PML can be implemented in a spherical shell surrounding the background
# domain. We can use the following complex coordinate transformation for
# PML:
#
# $$
# &\rho^{\prime} = \rho\left[1 +j \alpha/k_0 \left(\frac{r
# - r_{dom}}{r~r_{pml}}\right)\right] \\
# &z^{\prime} = z\left[1 +j \alpha/k_0 \left(\frac{r
# - r_{dom}}{r~r_{pml}}\right)\right] \\
# &\phi^{\prime} = \phi
# $$
#
# with $\alpha$ tuning the absorption inside the PML, and $r =
# \sqrt{\rho^2 + z^2}$. This coordinate transformation has the following
# Jacobian:
#
# $$
# \mathbf{J}=\mathbf{A}^{-1}= \nabla\boldsymbol{\rho}^
# \prime(\boldsymbol{\rho}) =
# \left[\begin{array}{ccc}
# \frac{\partial \rho^{\prime}}{\partial \rho} &
# \frac{\partial z^{\prime}}{\partial \rho} &
# 0 \\
# \frac{\partial \rho^{\prime}}{\partial z} &
# \frac{\partial z^{\prime}}{\partial z} &
# 0 \\
# 0 &
# 0 &
# \frac{\rho^\prime}{\rho}\frac{\partial \phi^{\prime}}{\partial \phi}
# \end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}
# J_{11} & J_{12} & 0 \\
# J_{21} & J_{22} & 0 \\
# 0 & 0 & J_{33}
# \end{array}\right]
# $$
#
# which we can use to calculate ${\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{pml}}$ and
# ${\boldsymbol{\mu}_{pml}}$:
#
# $$
# & {\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{pml}} =
# A^{-1} \mathbf{A} {\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_b}\mathbf{A}^{T}\\
# & {\boldsymbol{\mu}_{pml}} =
# A^{-1} \mathbf{A} {\boldsymbol{\mu}_b}\mathbf{A}^{T}
# $$
#
# For doing these calculations, we define the `pml_coordinate` and
# `create_mu_eps` functions:

# +


def pml_coordinate(x, r, alpha: float, k0: float, radius_dom: float, radius_pml: float):
    return (x + 1j * alpha / k0 * x * (r - radius_dom) / (radius_pml * r))


def create_eps_mu(pml, rho, eps_bkg, mu_bkg):
    J = ufl.grad(pml)

    # Transform the 2x2 Jacobian into a 3x3 matrix.
    J = ufl.as_matrix(((J[0, 0], J[0, 1], 0),
                       (J[1, 0], J[1, 1], 0),
                       (0, 0, pml[0] / rho)))

    A = ufl.inv(J)
    eps_pml = ufl.det(J) * A * eps_bkg * ufl.transpose(A)
    mu_pml = ufl.det(J) * A * mu_bkg * ufl.transpose(A)
    return eps_pml, mu_pml
# -

# We can now define some constants and geometrical parameters, and then
# we can generate the mesh with Gmsh, by using the function
# `generate_mesh_sphere_axis` in `mesh_sphere_axis.py`:


# +
# Constants
epsilon_0 = 8.8541878128 * 10**-12  # Vacuum permittivity
mu_0 = 4 * np.pi * 10**-7  # Vacuum permeability
Z0 = np.sqrt(mu_0 / epsilon_0)  # Vacuum impedance

# Radius of the sphere
radius_sph = 0.025

# Radius of the domain
radius_dom = 1

# Radius of the boundary where scattering efficiency is calculated
radius_scatt = 0.4 * radius_dom

# Radius of the PML shell
radius_pml = 0.25

# Mesh sizes
mesh_factor = 1
in_sph_size = mesh_factor * 2.0e-3
on_sph_size = mesh_factor * 2.0e-3
scatt_size = mesh_factor * 60.0e-3
pml_size = mesh_factor * 40.0e-3

# Tags for the subdomains
au_tag = 1
bkg_tag = 2
pml_tag = 3
scatt_tag = 4

model = None
gmsh.initialize(sys.argv)
if MPI.COMM_WORLD.rank == 0:
    # Mesh generation
    model = generate_mesh_sphere_axis(
        radius_sph, radius_scatt, radius_dom, radius_pml,
        in_sph_size, on_sph_size, scatt_size, pml_size,
        au_tag, bkg_tag, pml_tag, scatt_tag)

model = MPI.COMM_WORLD.bcast(model, root=0)
msh, cell_tags, facet_tags = io.gmshio.model_to_mesh(model, MPI.COMM_WORLD, 0, gdim=2)

gmsh.finalize()
MPI.COMM_WORLD.barrier()
# -

# Visually check of the mesh and of the subdomains using PyVista:

if have_pyvista:
    topology, cell_types, geometry = plot.vtk_mesh(msh, 2)
    grid = pyvista.UnstructuredGrid(topology, cell_types, geometry)
    plotter = pyvista.Plotter()
    num_local_cells = msh.topology.index_map(msh.topology.dim).size_local
    grid.cell_data["Marker"] = cell_tags.values[cell_tags.indices < num_local_cells]
    grid.set_active_scalars("Marker")
    plotter.add_mesh(grid, show_edges=True)
    plotter.view_xy()
    if not pyvista.OFF_SCREEN:
        plotter.show()
    else:
        pyvista.start_xvfb()
        figure = plotter.screenshot("sphere_axis_mesh.png", window_size=[500, 500])

# For the $\hat{\rho}$ and $\hat{z}$ components of the electric field,
# we will use Nedelec elements, while for the $\hat{\phi}$ components we
# will use Lagrange elements:

degree = 3
curl_el = element("N1curl", msh.basix_cell(), degree)
lagr_el = element("Lagrange", msh.basix_cell(), degree)
V = fem.functionspace(msh, mixed_element([curl_el, lagr_el]))

# The integration domains of our problem are the following:

# +
# Measures for subdomains
dx = ufl.Measure("dx", msh, subdomain_data=cell_tags, metadata={'quadrature_degree': 5})
dDom = dx((au_tag, bkg_tag))
dPml = dx(pml_tag)
# -

# The $\varepsilon_r$ function:

# +
n_bkg = 1  # Background refractive index
eps_bkg = n_bkg**2  # Background relative permittivity
eps_au = -1.0782 + 1j * 5.8089

D = fem.functionspace(msh, ("DG", 0))
eps = fem.Function(D)
au_cells = cell_tags.find(au_tag)
bkg_cells = cell_tags.find(bkg_tag)
eps.x.array[au_cells] = np.full_like(au_cells, eps_au, dtype=eps.x.array.dtype)
eps.x.array[bkg_cells] = np.full_like(bkg_cells, eps_bkg, dtype=eps.x.array.dtype)
eps.x.scatter_forward()
# -

# For the background field, we need to specify the wavelength (and the
# wavevector), angle of incidence, harmonic numbers and the intensity:

wl0 = 0.4  # Wavelength of the background field
k0 = 2 * np.pi / wl0  # Wavevector of the background field
theta = np.pi / 4  # Angle of incidence of the background field
m_list = [0, 1]  # list of harmonics
I0 = 0.5 * n_bkg / Z0  # Intensity


# where `m_list` contains the harmonic numbers we want to solve for. In
# general, we would need to solve for $m\in \mathbb{Z}$. However, for
# sub-wavelength structure (as our sphere), we can limit the calculation
# to few harmonic numbers, e.g., $m = -1, 0, 1$. Besides, we have that:
#
# $$
# &J_{-m}=(-1)^m J_m \\
# &J_{-m}^{\prime}=(-1)^m J_m^{\prime} \\
# &j^{-m}=(-1)^m j^m
# $$
#
# and therefore:
#
# $$
# &E_{b, \rho}^{(m)}=E_{b, \rho}^{(-m)} \\
# &E_{b, \phi}^{(m)}=-E_{b, \phi}^{(-m)} \\
# &E_{b, z}^{(m)}=E_{b, z}^{(-m)}
# $$
#
# In light of this, we can solve the problem for $m\geq 0$.
#
# We now now define `eps_pml` and `mu_pml`:

# +
rho, z = ufl.SpatialCoordinate(msh)
alpha = 5
r = ufl.sqrt(rho**2 + z**2)

pml_coords = ufl.as_vector((pml_coordinate(rho, r, alpha, k0, radius_dom, radius_pml),
                            pml_coordinate(z, r, alpha, k0, radius_dom, radius_pml)))

eps_pml, mu_pml = create_eps_mu(pml_coords, rho, eps_bkg, 1)
# -

# Define other objects that will be used inside our solver loop:

# +
# Total field
Eh_m = fem.Function(V)
Esh = fem.Function(V)

n = ufl.FacetNormal(msh)
n_3d = ufl.as_vector((n[0], n[1], 0))

# Geometrical cross section of the sphere, for efficiency calculation
gcs = np.pi * radius_sph**2

# Marker functions for the scattering efficiency integral
marker = fem.Function(D)
scatt_facets = facet_tags.find(scatt_tag)
incident_cells = mesh.compute_incident_entities(msh.topology, scatt_facets,
                                                msh.topology.dim - 1,
                                                msh.topology.dim)
midpoints = mesh.compute_midpoints(msh, msh.topology.dim, incident_cells)
inner_cells = incident_cells[(midpoints[:, 0]**2 + midpoints[:, 1]**2) < (radius_scatt)**2]
marker.x.array[inner_cells] = 1

# Define integration domain for the gold sphere
dAu = dx(au_tag)

# Define integration facet for the scattering efficiency
dS = ufl.Measure("dS", msh, subdomain_data=facet_tags)
# -

# We also specify a variable `phi`, corresponding to the $\phi$ angle of
# the cylindrical coordinate system that we will use to post-process the
# field and save it along the plane at $\phi = \pi/4$. In particular,
# the scattered field needs to be transformed for $m\neq 0$ in the
# following way:
#
# $$
# &E_{s, \rho}^{(m)}(\phi)=E_{s, \rho}^{(m)}(e^{-jm\phi}+e^{jm\phi}) \\
# &E_{s, \phi}^{(m)}(\phi)=E_{s, \phi}^{(m)}(e^{-jm\phi}-e^{jm\phi}) \\
# &E_{s, z}^{(m)}(\phi)=E_{s, z}^{(m)}(e^{-jm\phi}+e^{jm\phi})
# $$
#
# For this reason, we also add a `phase` constant for the above phase
# term:

# +
phi = np.pi / 4

# Initialize phase term
phase = fem.Constant(msh, default_scalar_type(np.exp(1j * 0 * phi)))
# -

# We now solve the problem:

for m in m_list:
    # Definition of Trial and Test functions
    Es_m = ufl.TrialFunction(V)
    v_m = ufl.TestFunction(V)

    # Background field
    Eb_m = fem.Function(V)
    f_rz = partial(background_field_rz, theta, n_bkg, k0, m)
    f_p = partial(background_field_p, theta, n_bkg, k0, m)
    Eb_m.sub(0).interpolate(f_rz)
    Eb_m.sub(1).interpolate(f_p)

    curl_Es_m = curl_axis(Es_m, m, rho)
    curl_v_m = curl_axis(v_m, m, rho)

    F = - ufl.inner(curl_Es_m, curl_v_m) * rho * dDom \
        + eps * k0 ** 2 * ufl.inner(Es_m, v_m) * rho * dDom \
        + k0 ** 2 * (eps - eps_bkg) * ufl.inner(Eb_m, v_m) * rho * dDom \
        - ufl.inner(ufl.inv(mu_pml) * curl_Es_m, curl_v_m) * rho * dPml \
        + k0 ** 2 * ufl.inner(eps_pml * Es_m, v_m) * rho * dPml
    a, L = ufl.lhs(F), ufl.rhs(F)

    problem = LinearProblem(a, L, bcs=[], petsc_options={"ksp_type": "preonly", "pc_type": "lu"})
    Esh_m = problem.solve()

    # Scattered magnetic field
    Hsh_m = -1j * curl_axis(Esh_m, m, rho) / (Z0 * k0)

    # Total electric field
    Eh_m.x.array[:] = Eb_m.x.array[:] + Esh_m.x.array[:]

# We can add our solution to the total scattered field, which also
# includes the transformation to the $\phi$ plane:

    phase.value = np.exp(-1j * m * phi)
    rotate_to_phi = ufl.as_vector((phase + ufl.conj(phase),
                                   phase + ufl.conj(phase),
                                   phase - ufl.conj(phase)))

    if m == 0:  # initialize and do not transform
        Esh = Esh_m
    elif m == m_list[0]:  # initialize and transform
        Esh = ufl.elem_mult(Esh_m, rotate_to_phi)
    else:  # transform
        Esh += ufl.elem_mult(Esh_m, rotate_to_phi)

# To check that  our calculations are correct, we can use as reference
# quantities the absorption and scattering efficiencies:

# +
    # Efficiencies calculation
    if m == 0:  # initialize and do not add 2 factor
        P = np.pi * ufl.inner(-ufl.cross(Esh_m, ufl.conj(Hsh_m)), n_3d) * marker
        Q = np.pi * eps_au.imag * k0 * (ufl.inner(Eh_m, Eh_m)) / Z0
        q_abs_fenics_proc = (fem.assemble_scalar(fem.form(Q * rho * dAu)) / gcs / I0).real
        q_sca_fenics_proc = (fem.assemble_scalar(fem.form((P('+') + P('-')) * rho * dS(scatt_tag))) / gcs / I0).real
        q_abs_fenics = msh.comm.allreduce(q_abs_fenics_proc, op=MPI.SUM)
        q_sca_fenics = msh.comm.allreduce(q_sca_fenics_proc, op=MPI.SUM)
    elif m == m_list[0]:  # initialize and add 2 factor
        P = 2 * np.pi * ufl.inner(-ufl.cross(Esh_m, ufl.conj(Hsh_m)), n_3d) * marker
        Q = 2 * np.pi * eps_au.imag * k0 * (ufl.inner(Eh_m, Eh_m)) / Z0 / n_bkg
        q_abs_fenics_proc = (fem.assemble_scalar(fem.form(Q * rho * dAu)) / gcs / I0).real
        q_sca_fenics_proc = (fem.assemble_scalar(fem.form((P('+') + P('-')) * rho * dS(scatt_tag))) / gcs / I0).real
        q_abs_fenics = msh.comm.allreduce(q_abs_fenics_proc, op=MPI.SUM)
        q_sca_fenics = msh.comm.allreduce(q_sca_fenics_proc, op=MPI.SUM)
    else:  # do not initialize and add 2 factor
        P = 2 * np.pi * ufl.inner(-ufl.cross(Esh_m, ufl.conj(Hsh_m)), n_3d) * marker
        Q = 2 * np.pi * eps_au.imag * k0 * (ufl.inner(Eh_m, Eh_m)) / Z0 / n_bkg
        q_abs_fenics_proc = (fem.assemble_scalar(fem.form(Q * rho * dAu)) / gcs / I0).real
        q_sca_fenics_proc = (fem.assemble_scalar(fem.form((P('+') + P('-')) * rho * dS(scatt_tag))) / gcs / I0).real
        q_abs_fenics += msh.comm.allreduce(q_abs_fenics_proc, op=MPI.SUM)
        q_sca_fenics += msh.comm.allreduce(q_sca_fenics_proc, op=MPI.SUM)

q_ext_fenics = q_abs_fenics + q_sca_fenics
# -

# The quantities `P` and `Q` have an additional `2` factor for `m != 0`
# due to parity.

# We now compare the numerical and analytical efficiencies (he latter
# were obtained with the following routine provided by the
# [`scattnlay`](https://github.com/ovidiopr/scattnlay) library):
#
# ```
# from scattnlay import scattnlay
#
# m = np.sqrt(eps_au)/n_bkg
# x = 2*np.pi*radius_sph/wl0*n_bkg
#
# q_sca_analyt, q_abs_analyt = scattnlay(np.array([x], dtype=np.complex128), np.array([m], dtype=np.complex128))[2:4]
# ```
#
# The numerical values are reported here below:

q_abs_analyt = 0.9622728008329892
q_sca_analyt = 0.07770397394691526
q_ext_analyt = q_abs_analyt + q_sca_analyt

# Finally, we can calculate the error and save our total scattered
# field:

# +
# Error calculation
err_abs = np.abs(q_abs_analyt - q_abs_fenics) / q_abs_analyt
err_sca = np.abs(q_sca_analyt - q_sca_fenics) / q_sca_analyt
err_ext = np.abs(q_ext_analyt - q_ext_fenics) / q_ext_analyt

if MPI.COMM_WORLD.rank == 0:
    print()
    print(f"The analytical absorption efficiency is {q_abs_analyt}")
    print(f"The numerical absorption efficiency is {q_abs_fenics}")
    print(f"The error is {err_abs*100}%")
    print()
    print(f"The analytical scattering efficiency is {q_sca_analyt}")
    print(f"The numerical scattering efficiency is {q_sca_fenics}")
    print(f"The error is {err_sca*100}%")
    print()
    print(f"The analytical extinction efficiency is {q_ext_analyt}")
    print(f"The numerical extinction efficiency is {q_ext_fenics}")
    print(f"The error is {err_ext*100}%")

# Check whether the geometrical and optical parameters are correct
# assert radius_sph / wl0 == 0.025 / 0.4
# assert eps_au == -1.0782 + 1j * 5.8089
# assert err_abs < 0.01
# assert err_sca < 0.01
# assert err_ext < 0.01

if has_vtx:
    v_dg_el = element("DG", msh.basix_cell(), degree, shape=(3, ))
    W = fem.functionspace(msh, v_dg_el)
    Es_dg = fem.Function(W)
    Es_expr = fem.Expression(Esh, W.element.interpolation_points())
    Es_dg.interpolate(Es_expr)
    with VTXWriter(msh.comm, "sols/Es.bp", Es_dg) as f:
        f.write(0.0)
# -
